Federal regulators will seek a civil penalty of $10.2 million against Southwest Airlines for failing to inspect older planes for cracks and then flying them before inspections were done.
 The penalty,
the largest ever, will be sought because the FAA states that Southwest operated nearly 60,000 flights in 2006 and 2007 using 46 planes that had missed inspections for possible fatigue-related cracking on the fuselage areas. The airline flew another 1,451 flights with the same planes in March 2007, even after discovering that it had failed to conduct the required inspections, the FAA charged. All but $200,000 of the proposed penalty dealt with those later flights. Southwest said six of the planes had small cracks that required repairs.
The agency had ordered airlines in September 2004 to
conduct inspections of some areas of the fuselage on some older models of
Boeing 737 aircraft once every 4,500 flights. "The FAA is taking
action against Southwest Airlines for a failing to follow rules that are
designed to protect passengers and crew," said Nicholas A. Sabatini, the
agency's associate administrator for safety. "We expect the airline
industry to fully comply with all FAA directives and take corrective
action." The airline said Thursday it had complied with regulators'
requests and would contest any penalty. The airline has 30 days to respond to
the FAA.
The aim of the FAA's 2004 directive was to make sure
airline crews found and repaired small cracks before they became large enough
to pose a safety hazard. A spokeswoman for Southwest, Beth Harbin, said
the airline brought the issue to the FAA's attention and believed it had
handled the matter to the agency's satisfaction. Harbin said the airline
believed the case was closed last year. "We brought in 46 airplanes
to take another look at them," Harbin said. "These are preventive
inspections. On six of the 46 we found the start of some very small cracking.
That's the intent of the inspection schedule, to find something before it
becomes a problem. These are safe planes." Harbin said Southwest
got Boeing's opinion that flying the planes for up to 10 days until they could
be inspected again did not compromise safety.
The FAA itself has come under fire for the Southwest
case. A congressional committee and the Transportation Department's inspector
general are looking into why the FAA didn't ground the planes when it learned
of the missed inspections a year ago. Rep. James Oberstar, D-Minn.,
chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said he got
information from whistle-blowers indicating that an FAA inspector let
Southwest operate flights before properly inspecting the planes. A hearing on
that matter was scheduled for next week but has been postponed until April.
FAA regulations require that airplanes be grounded if a mandatory inspection
has been missed, until the work can be performed.
The FAA could have sought a penalty of $25,000 per
violation, or up to $36 million, according to a person close to the situation
and who spoke on condition of anonymity. The person said the higher penalties
were unlikely, partly because the agency must consider the company's ability
to pay. Airlines are under heavy financial pressure because of high fuel
costs. Thomas R. Anthony, a former FAA inspector who now directs the
aviation safety program at the University of Southern California, said that if
Southwest operated flights with planes that should have been inspected,
"we have to ask how effective are the airline's internal controls. What
decisions allowed them to continue to operate" those planes.
The FAA has issued several directives to airlines
regarding the inspection of fuselages dating back to a horrific accident in
1988 in which the roof of an Aloha Airlines 737 peeled open during flight,
killing a flight attendant. The largest civil penalty the FAA has ever
imposed was $10 million, and the largest against an airline was $9.5 million
about two decades ago against Eastern Airlines.
 Email to a Friend
|
